<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
  <title>Gregg Bolinger - javafx tag</title>
  <link>http://www.greggbolinger.com/blog/tags/javafx/</link>
  <description></description>
  <language>en</language>
  <copyright>Gregg Bolinger</copyright>
  <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:58:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>Pebble (http://pebble.sourceforge.net)</generator>
  <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
  
  
  <item>
    <title>Random Thoughts of the Day</title>
    <link>http://www.greggbolinger.com/blog/2008/10/30/1225411200000.html</link>
    
      
      
        <description>
          This is just sort of a rambling of general thoughts that by themselves don&#039;t amount to much but all of them together might make for a nice blog entry, I thought.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#034;http://www.greggbolinger.com/blog/2008/10/30/1225411200000.html&#034;&gt;Read more...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
        </description>
      
    
    
    
    <comments>http://www.greggbolinger.com/blog/2008/10/30/1225411200000.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greggbolinger.com/blog/2008/10/30/1225411200000.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <title>JavaFX Too Late...But Who Cares</title>
    <link>http://www.greggbolinger.com/blog/2008/08/01/1217623140232.html</link>
    
      
        <description>
          I think around 2005 AJAX crept into buzz worthy status.  Book publishers were happy again.  &lt;a href=&#034;http://www.pascarello.com/&#034;&gt;Eric Pascarello&lt;/a&gt;
got to laugh at everyone for making fun of his love for JavaScript.
Rich Internet Application became the defacto term for web 2.0.  And
developing web applications now meant knowing nearly 10 entirely
different technologies.  I&#039;m not complaining.  It has paid my bills as
well.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then, all of a sudden, and it seemed as if it were out
of nowhere, Flex announced itself to the world.  Microsoft counters
with Silverlight.  Sun realizes they dropped the ball, again, and
started working on JavaFX.  Here is how I remember it going down.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Macromedia
announces Flex.  Right out of the gate they had the FlexBuilder IDE,
all the widgets you really needed, Data Service Providers,
documentation, tutorials, evangalists.  Adobe buys Macromedia and it
gets even bigger.  Flex goes open source.  Everyone is talking about
it.  Book publishers get to make money again.  Key Sun engineers leave
Sun and go to work for Adobe.  But where are the Flex driven
applications?  Where are the AIR applications?  I&#039;m sure some of you
will drop a few links in the comments.  But considering the number of
blogs I read the the number of different kinds of websites I visit not
only for fun but also to try and keep abreast of the latest and
greatest going on in development, I have yet to run across a Flex
driven web site.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the heals of Flex Microsoft announces
Silverlight.  Support in the latest Visual Studio already there. 
Documentation, evangalists, controls, Data Service Providers,
integration with all that is .NET.  Book publishers are happy again. 
But where are all the Silverlight driven web sites/applications? 
Again, I haven&#039;t ran across any.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;JavaFX announces itself to the
world.  There is an SDK you can download.  Little to no documentation. 
No IDE support.  Not even a beta version is available.  A year later we
have some documentation.  A couple of books.  Still no 1.0 release. 
Netbeans is the only IDE with true built in support.  Doesn&#039;t work that
great on Linux (even though Java is multiplatform).  Obviously, no
non-demo applications driven with JavaFX.  The JavaFX website isn&#039;t even
driven by JavaFX.&lt;b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/b&gt;What does all this mean?  Nothing really.  These RIA technologies are popular the same way all these Web Frameworks are popular.  Everyone thinks they are cool.  Everyone blogs about them.  In the real world, no one really uses them.  They are all designed for cookie cutter web applications which we all know don&#039;t really exist.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With that said, FLAME ON!&lt;br /&gt;
        </description>
      
      
    
    
    
    <comments>http://www.greggbolinger.com/blog/2008/08/01/1217623140232.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greggbolinger.com/blog/2008/08/01/1217623140232.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  <item>
    <title>Benchmarks Mean Squat</title>
    <link>http://www.greggbolinger.com/blog/2008/04/06/1207529520000.html</link>
    
      
        <description>
          &lt;p&gt;
I just read a &lt;a href=&#034;http://weblogs.java.net/blog/joshy/archive/2008/04/at_the_speed_of.html&#034;&gt;claim&lt;/a&gt; that JavaFX benchmarked at 186 fps.  I thought that was pretty impressive.  I had to check it out.  I followed the link to the BubbleMark site and tried the JavaFX jnlp on both JDK1.6.0_05 and JDK1.6.0_10 preview release.  Both performed miserably.  9 FPS!!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My machine&#039;s specs:
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Ubuntu 7.10 - Gnome Desktop (Compiz turned off)
&lt;li&gt;Duel Core 2.1GHz
&lt;li&gt;4GB RAM
&lt;li&gt;NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT (256MB)
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
All this proves really is that benchmarks mean squat.&lt;/p&gt;

        </description>
      
      
    
    
    
    <comments>http://www.greggbolinger.com/blog/2008/04/06/1207529520000.html#comments</comments>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.greggbolinger.com/blog/2008/04/06/1207529520000.html</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 00:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
  
  </channel>
</rss>
